Sokoine University of Agriculture

The evolution of pyrimethamine resistant dhfr in Plasmodium falciparum of south-eastern Tanzania: comparing selection under SP alone vs SP +artesunate combination

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Malisa, Allen L
dc.contributor.author Pearce, Richard J
dc.contributor.author Mutayoba, Ben M
dc.contributor.author Abdullah, Salim
dc.contributor.author Mshinda, Hassan
dc.contributor.author Kachur, Patrick S
dc.contributor.author Bloland, Peter
dc.contributor.author Roper, Cally
dc.date.accessioned 2016-12-14T11:48:04Z
dc.date.available 2016-12-14T11:48:04Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.uri https://www.suaire.sua.ac.tz/handle/123456789/1105
dc.description Malaria Journal 2011 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) resistance is now widespread throughout east and southern Africa and artemisinin compounds in combination with synthetic drugs (ACT) are recommended as replacement treatments by the World Health Organization (WHO). As well as high cure rates, ACT has been shown to slow the development of resistance to the partner drug in areas of low to moderate transmission. This study looked for evidence of protection of the partner drug in a high transmission African context. The evaluation was part of large combination therapy pilot implementation programme in Tanzania, the Interdisciplinary Monitoring Programme for Antimalarial Combination Therapy (IMPACT-TZ) Methods: The growth of resistant dhfr in a parasite population where SP Monotherapy was the first-line treatment was measured for four years (2002-2006), and compared with the development of resistant dhfr in a neighbouring population where SP + artesunate (SP+AS) was used as the first-line treatment during the same interval. The effect of the differing treatment regimes on the emergence of resistance was addressed in three ways. First, by looking at the rate of increase in frequency of pre-existing mutant dhfr alleles under monotherapy and combination therapy. Second, by examining whether de-novo mutant alleles emerged under either treatment. Finally, by measuring diversity at three dhfr flanking microsatellite loci upstream of the dhfr gene Results: The reduction in SP selection pressure resulting from the adoption of ACT slowed the rate of increase in the frequency of the triple mutant resistant dhfr allele. Comparing between the two populations, the higher levels of genetic diversity in sequence flanking the dhfr triple mutant allele in the population where the ACT regimen had been used indicates the reduction in SP selection pressure arising from combination therapy. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that, alleles containing two mutations at the dhfr have arisen at least four times independently while those containing triple mutant dhfr arose only once, and were found carrying a single unique Asian-type flanking sequence, which apparently drives the spread of pyrimethamine resistance associated dhfr alleles in east Africa. SP+AS is not recommended for use in areas where SP cure rates are less than 80% but this study reports an observed principle of combination protection from an area where pyrimethamine resistance was already high. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Malaria Journal en_US
dc.subject Evolution en_US
dc.subject Pyrimethamine resistance en_US
dc.subject Microsatellites en_US
dc.subject Combination therapy en_US
dc.title The evolution of pyrimethamine resistant dhfr in Plasmodium falciparum of south-eastern Tanzania: comparing selection under SP alone vs SP +artesunate combination en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.url http://www.malariajournal.com/content/10/1/317 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search SUA IR


Browse

My Account

Statistics